Disjointed analysis in Murdoch's NewsCorp media across multiple (often seemingly unrelated) factors, bypassing data analysis principles according to Statistics 101 and ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics advice on using the NOM net overseas migration formula, that feeds into estimated resident population headline data; misdescribed as undefined 'immigration'.
However… 2006, the NOM was inflated, follows the fossil fuel climate science denial techniques used to misrepresent and denigrate climate science research by misinterpreting data, claiming non existent correlations etc. and in the media shooting messengers or centrist government.
Using a right wing 'wedge' and foil to the criticism directed at fossil fuels in Anglosphere, plus parts of Europe, informed by former ZPG Zero Population Growth white nativist Tanton Network. In the US it shares donors with Koch Network think tanks behind the GOP Republican Party and Trump, Bannon, Miller and FoxNews border obsessions including climate science denial; ditto the same networks in the U.K. Tories, UKIP/Reform, Farage, Anderson and GB News for Brexit.
Unvoiced or silent objective? Corrupt white nativist authoritarian autarky like 1930s Italy and Germany, or 19th century America of planters, master servant relationships and 'segregation economics', informed by the eugenics movement and the Mont Pelerin Society?
'From NewsCom:
'Simply too high': Australia nearing crucial immigration 'peak
Aussies have been warned that a current crisis plaguing the country could become "permanent".
Leith van Onselen
'ANALYSIS'
Last week, the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released the official population statistics for the September quarter of 2023, which revealed that Australia's population grew by an unprecedented 660,000 people over the year, driven by record net overseas migration (NOM) of 549,000.
In percentage terms, Australia's population grew by 2.5 per cent, the nation's fastest growth rate since 1952, during the post-war migration boom.
(No, this defies both direct ABS advice and Statistics 101, NOM definition changed in 2006, cannot compare before and after
'23 Estimates of NOM based on the previous methods and those based on the '12/16 month rule' methodology are not comparable. The key change is the introduction of the '12/16 month rule' for measuring a person's residency in Australia, replacing the previous '12/12 month rule'.' ABS Explanatory Notes.)
Meanwhile, Australia's natural population increase was a historically low 111,000 in the year to September 2023, courtesy of a jump in deaths, most likely related to the Baby Boomers beginning to die off and the impacts of the pandemic.
As a result, NOM as a share of Australia's population increase remained at a record high of 83 per cent in the September quarter of 2023.
Separate annual data released by the ABS for the 2022-23 financial year showed that Australia's capital cities grew by an unprecedented 517,000 in the year to 30 June 2023.
Melbourne (167,500) led the nation's population growth last year, followed by Sydney (146,700).
The ABS' monthly permanent and long-term arrivals data provide a useful proxy for the official quarterly NOM.
Annual net permanent and long-term arrivals hit a record high in January, suggesting that Australia's official NOM and population growth would have increased further in the December quarter of 2023.
In its December Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Update (MYEFO), the Albanese government forecast that Australia's NOM would fall to 375,000 this financial year, which would represent the second-highest annual NOM in Australia's history.
However, given the acceleration of NOM in the September quarter and the stronger-than-anticipated net permanent and long-term arrivals numbers to January, Australia should expect significantly higher NOM this financial year than the government's forecast.
The good news is that visa data suggests that NOM is at or near its peak.
According to the ABS, there were 402,000 net visa arrivals (excluding visitors) in the year to February 2024, down from a recent peak of 503,000.
This decline in visa arrivals has been driven by foreign students, which fell to 221,000 in the year to February, down from a recent peak of 294,000.
Australian renters are being smashed (source or evidence?)
The migration surge's impact on the nation's rental market has been particularly severe since the population boom occurred alongside the collapse in dwelling construction to decade-lows.
According to the ABS, Australia added only 155,600 homes (net of demolitions) to the nation's dwelling stock in the year to September 2023, against a population increase of 660,000.
Therefore, Australia added only one new home for every 4.24 new residents. This explains why the nation's rental vacancy rate has collapsed to a record low of around one per cent.
(No evidence simply talking points while ignoring the more unique housing types and requirements of international students and diversity of supply versus first home buyer and families)
Reflecting this demand-supply imbalance, median asking rents across Australia have soared by 38 per cent since the beginning of the pandemic, according to PropTrack, with almost all of this growth occurring after the federal government opened the international border to migration in late 2021.
With Australia's net overseas migration and population growth to remain historically high for the foreseeable future, and the rate of dwelling construction expected to continue falling, the housing situation will remain fraught.
As a result, Australian tenants should prepare for further tightening of the rental market and ongoing strong rental inflation.
Australia needs a smaller and better-targeted immigration system
Few people would disagree that Australia's immigration numbers are too high.
While migrants undoubtedly fill important labour market gaps across the economy, the sheer volume of arrivals has placed chronic pressure on the housing market and the nation's infrastructure.
(No evidence, infrastructure requires healthy budgets from taxes plus skilled personnel and especially skilled migrants; clear issue in regions with population ageing and decline)
A report released this month by the Committee for Economic Development of Australia (CEDA) showed that "recent migrants earn significantly less than Australian-born workers" (because they are not 'migrants' but international student, on low income?) and that "migrants have become increasingly likely to work in lower productivity firms", earning more than 10 per cent less than Australian-born workers on average.
The CEDA report also showed that the unemployment rates of recent skilled migrants are higher than Australian-born workers.
CEDA's findings are supported by the latest Graduate Outcomes Survey, which shows that international graduate employment rates, participation rates, and median salaries are well below those of domestic graduates.
(What if the other way round, then there would be complaints that domestic graduates are being usurped by international students in graduate employment?)
Research released in November 2023 by independent economist Gerard Minack showed that Australia's 8.2 million population increase this century has outpaced the provision of business investment, infrastructure and housing, resulting in what economists call "capital shallowing" and reduced productivity growth.
"Australia's economic performance in the decade before the pandemic was, on many measures, the worst in 60 years", Minack wrote in his November report.
"Per capita GDP growth was low, productivity growth tepid, real wages were stagnant, and housing increasingly unaffordable. There were many reasons for the mess, but the most important was a giant capital-to-labour switch: Australia relied on increasing labour supply, rather than increasing investment, to drive growth.
"Australia's population-led growth model was a demonstrable failure in the 15 years prior to the pandemic. Remarkably, the country now seems to be doubling down on the same strategy. The result, unsurprisingly, is likely to be more of the same."
(No, wrong as our population was inflated by the NOM expansion in 2006 sweeping up international students who study and work part time, i.e. low income, hence, averaging or per capita does not reflect this).
To add further insult to injury, data compiled by the Grattan Institute shows that a significantly smaller share of migrants work in the construction sector than their Australian-born counterparts.
"About 32 per cent of Australian workers were foreign born, but only about 24 per cent of workers in building and construction were born overseas", the Grattan Institute wrote in January.
"And very few recent migrants work in construction. Migrants who arrived in Australia less than five years ago account for just 2.8 per cent of the construction workforce, but account for 4.4 per cent of all workers in Australia".
Therefore, Australia's immigration system is directly adding to Australia's housing and productivity problems in two ways.
First, immigration volumes are simply too high, overwhelming the supply side of the economy.
(No, there is no optimum number but demographic balance for a youngish population, while international students spike data via the NOM, but described as 'immigrants' vs. far larger ageing baby boomer bomb)
Second, the migration system is poorly targeted and does not provide the skills the economy needs.
(Evidence?)
The fact that the nation's population has ballooned by 8.2 million people (44 per cent) this century alone, yet Australia's skills shortages are worse than ever, is empirical evidence of these facts.
(No, it's higher churn over as many of those originals were temporary, and are no longer resident in Australia; where is the evidence of skills shortages being worse due to immigrants?)
Australia, therefore, needs a migration system that is much smaller in size and better targeted towards the skills we need.
(Opinion or motherhood statement lacking specifics)
Australia's migration system must be calibrated to a level below the nation's ability to supply homes, infrastructure, and business investment while safeguarding the natural environment (including water supplies).
(Opinion or Motherhood statement lacking specifics)
Otherwise, Australia's housing shortage will become permanent, and productivity growth and living standards will flounder.
(No, if a shortage why have Sydney house values stagnated for past decade i.e. price only doubled?)'
Leith van Onselen is co-founder of MacroBusiness.com.au and Chief Economist at the MB Fund and MB Super. Leith has previously worked at the Australian Treasury, Victorian Treasury and Goldman Sachs.
For more blogs and articles on Australian Immigration News, Australian Politics, Demography, International Education, Media, Tanton Network and White Nationalism click through:
Posted on March 25, 2024
One has written previously on the wilful confusion around immigration and population data used for demographic analysis in the Anglosphere, also to dog whistle refugees, immigrants and population growth.
However, requires the misrepresenting of data and research using climate science denial techniques used by entities linked to both Tanton Network and Koch Network, deflecting from carbon or fossil fuels and promoting eugenics; in Australia and US using proxies to replicate previous race based immigration restrictions.
Posted on March 11, 2024
Late news is that the former Labour MP, then Conservative MP and now Reform, Lee Anderson, has quite xenophobic views on both foreigners and fellow citizens, the new normal that is being actively promoted?
Repost from ByLine Times of AC Grayling article on Anglo, western and other nations negative attitudes that lack empathy, shared experience or understanding of refugees, asylum seekers and immigration history.
Nowadays with above median age voter dominated by less educated, less diverse, low info and more often regional voter, they are targeted by right wing nativist or white nationalist talking points for suboptimal outcomes e.g. Brexit, Trump, The Voice and those demanding no support for Ukraine vs. Russia's invasion or 'special operation'.
Posted on January 2, 2024
The far right did not emerge from a vacuum, but ignorance of the history of eugenics, authority, slavery, colonialism, Nazi Germany and post WWII, white nativists, especially in the US, and nowadays ageing democracies and right wing media which adopt the same.
Both Malthus and Galton are central to narratives around population control, identity and eugenics, with strong undercurrent of socio-Darwinism. By post WWI eugenics became a major area of research, not just in Germany via Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes, but the US too with slavery, Madison Grant and AES American Eugenics Society.
Due to the holocaust and Nazis treatment of Jews, Gypsies and minorities, including the 'left' i.e. being exterminated, eugenics had to be rebranded post WWII as a quasi 'environmental' movement, with strong support of same fossil fuel Rockefellers (Standard Oil & Exxon) and auto oligarchs (Fiat & VW) via Club of Rome and ZPG Zero Population Growth.
Posted on November 30, 2023
Jeff Sparrow in Overland rebuts a counter critique of his book 'Crimes Against Nature' by a faux expert Edward Smith who appears to be au faire with faux environmental and anti-immigrant arguments promoted by the US Tanton Network linked NGO Sustainable Population Australia.
One would not bother using high level analysis to rebut low level faux science nativist agitprop inspired by former ZPG Zero Population Growth types, namely deceased white nationalist John 'passive eugenics' Tanton whose colleague was Paul 'Population Bomb' Ehrlich, with support from the Rockefeller Bros., 'limits to growth' PR constructs promoted by Club of Rome and drawing on Malthus, Galton and Madison Grant.
However, it does show some of the influence that proponents aspire to, whether in media, NGOs, think tanks or politics, constantly reinforce old nativist and white Australia policy tropes masquerading as environmental science, greenwashing both fossil fuels or carbon emissions and eugenics; targets old white Australia sentiments and younger mistaking the movement and proponents as experts.
Posted on May 10, 2023
The Australian Migration Review Report has been published, based on narratives and submissions, but little meaningful grass roots feedback or data to support any grounded analysis for good future reforms?
This post will focus on NOM Net Overseas Migration and major source or factor i.e. international education and students, but for now, not the other main factors including WHV Working Holiday Visas (2nd year) and temporary workers.
There are generic review report issues e.g. lack of direct support for many narratives and recommendations, does not explain budget issues of ageing i.e. more low or no tax payers in retirement as baby boomer bubble transitions vs. decline in working age cohort of PAYE taxpayers, to support more Australian retirees.
Posted on March 7, 202
Interesting analysis from Grattan Institute in Melbourne on how to improve Australia's migration system, especially for temporary entrants.
However, although one agrees with the broad argument and sentiments, many assumptions and factors cited including the need to make more temporary residents permanent, would require raising, for now, the modest permanent cap, guaranteed to kick off a negative media campaign.
Further, one thinks it overestimates the desire for 'temporary migrants', caught under the 'nebulous' (Ian Dunt UK) NOM net overseas migration, to remain in Australia permanently after studies, travel, work etc.?
No comments:
Post a Comment