With stuff on my post on men and boys; with stuff on how bad things are out there; with all of this, the question is: How do you know?
I realized my idea that every woman was the predatory partner in a divorce was mostly (MOSTLY. I've heard of a few others, but not that bad) one woman who has divorced either six or seven times. And yeah, she knows how to manipulate the court system and some of what she did was unconscionable. (Note she's staying anonymous to protect the guilty.) And she has single-handedly shaped my perception of divorce court in the US. And yes, I've known of predatory males who got away with stuff too, but less often.
Here's the thing, though: how do we know? My perception is that the skew is maybe 60% of predatory females. Is it? Or is it that there are a few bad females, and males keep marrying them? Partly because males can get protective aroused off a good sob story. Partly because males prefer the intersection of hot and crazy to the point of making it a joke.
I do know a lot -- a lot of conservative/normal/well behaved girls who never found someone, or who found someone really late.
Now, it is irrefutable that most of officialdom right now from the schools on out is prejudiced in favor of women. Anyone who had kids in public school in the last 20 years, knows and a few are even willing to admit it.
But why does anyone assume -- as one of the commenters did -- that "this is what women wanted! Women created this system" -- which is hilarious posted on the blog of a woman speaking up in defense of men and boys and in answer to a female commenter who is a regular here? What sense does that make? The worst "you can't treat my little girl that way!" when trying to punish a girl or young woman for blatantly BAD behavior is always from men. Sure usually relatives, but men. The worst, most out of touch "being a white male is the easy mode of life" feminists are ALWAYS male.
So where does the idea all females support this come from? Ah, well, it comes from interviews with female actors/directors. From female talking heads. From angry-feminist-politician.
But why in G-d's green Earth (or out of it) would you thing ALL women are represented by those figures and loud mouths? As well believe every rich person is a thief, every male is a rapist/evil, every white person is racist. Because those are the same images projected from the exact same sources. So, why would you think they are right? Or that most women protect them.
But then, you say, why are these women not "speaking out!" Gestures at blog. Obviously some of us are speaking out.
Why aren't we in the movies/TV news/interviews, then?
Well, yes. That is the question you should be asking yourself. And the answer would be "Because that's not the image of women that the officialdom wants to project." Partly because they think if women think all women are feminists, women will fall into line (they haven't met some of us, obviously.) And partly because they want men to not trust women.
They also want women not to trust men. Hence the same sources portray every man as the deeply wounded but seriously out of touch man who came here to advocate all women should be beheaded. Because that keeps women away from men. And makes women fall for bullshit like "Should trust men not to rape." As though most men WOULD automatically rape.
In the same way I've heard people ranting about other races. "They want this!" How do you know? No, seriously. How do you know? It wasn't black people burning and looting for BLM. If you ever encountered any of the Buy Large Mansions crowds in the flesh, you'd see they were mostly white, and frankly mostly young college women, at the age when they still believe the lies TV and their elders tell them. No, not because most women are leftist, but because young women are the most group-influenced creatures in the human race. So, they are, you know, trying to be liked by doing what they've been told is approved.
But out news managed to project the idea that the people burning and looting were black so much that even now a lot of people believe that Kyle Rittenhouse killed black men.
So, how do you know most black people support it? More importantly, if they do, how many of them -- like the very young women -- do it because they too have been lied to? Do you know how many black people in our communities I've met who are defensive, until they realize I'm not carrying any kind of racial animus, and in fact I normally don't actually NOTICE people's color. (Which the left will tell you is racist. Yes. And you should ask yourself why they tell you this.) In fact, the black people I met who weren't deeply suspicious until they knew me better are the exception. Because as badly as you've been propagandized, they've had it a million times worse. And most of what they've been lied through is the supposedly public education, sanctioned by our federal government, which teaches them raspers like that the US was founded FOR slavery. Or that only black people were ever enslaved and only by white people. Or-- Some of those lies were perpetrated with the best possible intentions, like "to build up their racial image" (though how they thought that worked, is something else, unless you understand they consider there is inherent value in victimhood) but they are still egregious lies, and in the end, they turn one race against the other. And here keep in mind that race in the US is a phantom. Most of the self-identified black people in the US look completely white to my foreign born and educated eyes. It's literally like looking at the far side cartoon of Penguin bathrooms, with two identical images on the door, and "Only they can tell the difference." But they've been convinced if they have the one drop, everyone who doesn't hates them or -- pass Whoopy Goldberg who is dumber than most boxes of rocks and possibly even dumber than Occasional Cortex -- wants to enslave them. Because they were taught there. By our schools. Paid for and supported by our tax dollars. And fed approved teachers, created by our system of accreditation.
But if that weren't enough, they are now also being fed a completely fantasy version of history, by our entertainment in which black people were always 50% of every population, including in regency England, and there was a system of apartheid like in the old South Africa, and everyone lies about noblemen and QUEENS not being black, because that's how much we hate black people.
Are they defensive and a little crazy. Sure. But that's because of what they don't know but think they do. In the same way that college feminists might approve of the crazy feminist initiatives in our society and institutions but that's because they think they know things and they don't. And they were fed that by the establishment.
Mostly we run into this under the guise of "everyone went along with the lockdowns. No one protested." While that is a confusing issue because as many people on the right as on the left fell for it, a lot of us were protesting to the limits of our ability. And a lot of bigger people than I were protesting, and were silenced, threatened with the loss of professional licensing and worse.
In the same way, when people were saying "People are staying home because they're getting money from the government" when in fact, if you looked at the money most people got, it wasn't enough for anyone to stay home in even a pretense of comfort. Mostly the persons I knew who chose not to go back to work were pink collar workers who suddenly realized they would rather be homemakers and look after their own kids and made the appropriate cuts. Or younger people who were forced to move home for the lockdowns, and couldn't find jobs after. (So many of them.)
Which brings us to the "kids these days." First there is the notion of the student loans and how many people on the right -- almost all commenters but me -- go on about how the loans were legal, therefore must be paid, and also how forgiving them benefits "doctors and lawyers."
There are two huge fallacies in that: we always have punished predatory lenders, nor their victims. And this is the epitome of predatory lenders: someone who loans money for something that everyone tells someone very young and naive they "have to have." Even though it's ridiculously expensive, the goods are tainted and the lender is the American government. Also, these young people --kept naive and without jobs by law until the date they get the loan -- know --not just are told -- that you do in fact have to have a degree, because even fast food places require a BA or BS to let you do anything more than serve burgers.
Second the "doctors and lawyers" is a nice -- surely planted -- bit of leftist cant and envy mongering. Sure, some doctors and lawyers do very well for themselves. And most doctors and lawyers have huge loans. What you are missing -- perhaps -- is the ten to twelve years of study before they earn ANYTHING following by five to ten years of practice when they are objectively paid less than minimum wage per hour. Followed by yeah, some years of relatively high wages, but not as high as it used to be. In lawyers' case because there have been a lot of them graduated. And in doctors' cases... well, HB1 visas, eh?
But beyond all that, how do you know it's "doctors and lawyers" benefiting from loan forgiveness? The ones I know, none of Biden's skivvy forgiveness has even begun to touch. And if you forgave 10k or their loans they wouldn't even feel it. So, how do you know?
Well, it's what everyone says, isn't it? And though you see it mostly on the right, isn't that whole envy thing a lefty talking point? And where did it first come from?
I bring all this up because recently I came across a "Biden is gaining on Trump on the polls" and the usual right wing barking seals either go "it's because this was the" (leftist mondo brains. Who even believes in those) "plan all along. Trump can't win, because Truuuuuuump" and the others are going "Oh, people are that stupid and actually want socialist slavery."
And no one asks the obvious question "What polls? How structured? And BTW what has Biden done, suddenly to increase his popularity?" Or are these polls being manipulated to hide the theft already in progression?
For years I've watched right wing sites change their whole approach on the assumption that elections were clean and people wanted socialism, even though it's blatantly obvious they weren't.
And please, let's not get wildly optimistic about November. As much as Biden stinks on ice, they have not only infinite votes created by crooked machines, but they are now giving illegal invaders papers at the border advising them on how to vote. For Biden, of course.
So here's the thing, they're preparing the fraud, and they want you to turn against all your fellow Americans, and think they want the destruction of the country.
And therefore with everything, you must ask yourself "How do you know?"
I don't remember the statute, but apparently there was something that forbid our agencies propagandizing our own people, and using the same techniques they used to "build democracy" and opinion abroad.
Well, that was completely lifted by Obama, but it was already being not-respected under Clinton.
You are being propagandized. The intent of the propaganda is to turn American against American.
While you're waiting "All women who want this" and "All men who are all rapists" and all "people who tan they want this" "people who don't tan, they want to oppress me", while you're telling the young they should suffer like you did, while most of them are being squeezed like lemons to the last drop and see no future...
Well, if you're turning the old against the young, the young against the old, and every possible group against each other...
None of us are turning against the real culprits: the power-pigs who have infiltrated our institutions, who concentrate more and more power into their hands, who bring in foreigners to eat out our substance, who in fact are killing us so they can enrich themselves.
And that's what they want.
So when you hear that some group is bringing your misery, don't be a fool. There's only one group doing that: those (mostly Marxists) in charge of our bureaucracies, supported, aided and abetted by the corrupt educational establishment and covered up by the media.
And even there, remember it's the ones in charge. Not the poor slob trying to do some good and earn a pay check. Yes, some of those are corrupt, but I know a lot of them, and they're doing the best they can in a corrupt system and often with their hands tied. (And before you say they shouldn't take that job, have you looked at what jobs are actually available, now?)
This was brought home to me again by Bill Reader asking how Europe is doing. Are they starting to feel their yoke and rebel? And I had to tell him i don't know. It's even worse there, because they don't have a first amendment and therefore no blogs.
How do we know?
We don't. And the reason we don't know is deliberate. You can kind of sort of sometimes see the outline of the truth, by what is selling or isn't, or through family gossip and a feel for things.
But in general?
Spit out the propaganda. It's poisonous.
The enemy are those with the boot on your necks. Sure, some of your fellow Americans might have been lied to enough to go along with them. Doesn't mean you should, also, just to make up the weight. If all the other mammoths jumped off the cliff, would you do it too? What, so you could be butchered at the bottom?
Be not afraid, be not credulous, and be not stupid. The last most of all.
Remember they are lying to you. Don't let them in your head.
No comments:
Post a Comment