i think you don't marry someone and be happy;
you be happy first, and marrying someone great is just one manifestation of your inner happiness.
so it rubs me off when we say i can't live without you—the sentence by itself is neutral and the feelings of genuine love it tries to convey is all great. but when taken to its literal meaning... mmm i don't think so.
to not be able to live without someone is, in a way, displacing our inner source of happiness and contentment into something else outside our control. not that it by itself is bad (or good); but one must be prepared to be unhappy when living out of such tenet literally.
not that there're any objectively better or worse ways to live—it's all a game of tradeoffs. all about free choice.
but if it was me, i'd probably choose to be happy first and, whoever i'll marry one day, emanate the world's worth of love and happiness already within me
into our life together.
No comments:
Post a Comment