layoftheland376996452 posted: " Enlisting support against delisting terrorists By Jonathan Feldstein [Ed note: At the time of publication of this article, Politico media reports that President Biden has "finalized his decision to keep Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp" Lay Of The Land
[Ed note: At the time of publication of this article, Politico media reports that President Biden has "finalized his decision to keep Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on U.S. notorious terrorist blacklist."]
There have been recent reports that the Biden administration is planning to remove five groups from the US' foreign terrorist blacklist. Each of these groups is now considered defunct. But it's strange that if they are defunct anyway, why anyone would worry about delisting them. It's better to let dead terror groups lie.
The groups include Basque Fatherland and Liberty, Aum Shinrikyo, a Japanese cult; Kach, an Israeli/nationalist Jewish group, and two Islamic groups: the Mujahideen Shura Council in the environs of Jerusalem, and Gama'a al-Islamiyya.
When I read the reports, I asked myself why, and why now? A Christian friend reached out to me to get an understanding from an Israeli perspective, and whether it was something for which she needs to pray. I explained to my friend that it seems the delisting of these groups is connected with ongoing reports that the Biden administration is considering removing Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) from the US terror blacklist as part of wooing Iran to renew the Obama-era nuclear deal.
Just to be clear, the IRGC is directly responsible for the killing of some 600 U.S. military and is far from defunct. A group of 46 retired U.S. generals and a growing number of Democrats and Republicans are on record urging the Biden administration not to remove the IRGC from the terrorist blacklist.
In this context, I explained to my friend that not only does it not make sense to delist defunct terror groups but doing so is deliberately dangerous. Typically, when members of a board, alumni of an institution, or other notables pass away, they are not removed but are identified by a note that they are now deceased. Why not just leave the list of terror groups as is, and make a note that they are defunct? Listing those that are no longer active actually shows success in the war on terror.
To Delist or not to Delist? Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei meeting with leaders of the IRGC last January. Will the Biden administration remove Iran's IRGC from terror blacklist? (Photo: Handout via Getty)
I told my friend that delisting the defunct organizations is a smoke screen for plans to delist the very active IRGC. Anyone who cares about the threats of Islamic terror in general, and to Israel in particular, will be uncomfortable with the delisting of two Islamic terror groups. However, the Biden administration's machinations appears expedient – like the tossing a bone to placate some in Congress - by the inclusion of the Jewish/nationalist group Kach, creating the pseudo impression that the administration is being equitable. There's no reason to delist any of these – including Kach. It's also offensive to those who were the victims of these and other terror groups.
My friend is a Hispanic pastor. She revealed how the removal at the end of 2021 of Columbia's FARC off the US list of terrorist organizationsproved traumatic for Hispanics who had suffered under the ruthless terrorist and drug trafficking group that raped and destroyed and kidnapped poor Colombians for decades.
FARC Fiends. On May 15, 2000 the Colombian FARC put an explosive collar around the neck of a woman, killing her and a man who tried to neutralize the device. (Photo of FARC soldiers: Pablo de Tarso Luz Meneghel Sparco)
The similarities are astounding. It was reported that the Biden administration's delisting of the 'now defunct' Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) rebel group as a "foreign terrorist" organization was to support a tenuous peace agreement in Colombia. As a rule, wooing terrorists with promises of turning a blind eye rather than confronting and defeating them is not good policy.
This applies to FARC in Colombia, and IRGC in Iran.
Clearly what's behind this is to bring Iran to sign a new or revised nuclear agreement which has become a pilar of US foreign policy. Seeing the Biden administration's eagerness to renew an agreement at any cost, the Iranians have used this as a make-or-break negotiating tactic.
The IRGC is on the terrorist list as a central part of Iran's military. However, it operates far beyond a typical military unit simply preparing for combat. Since the 1979 Iranian revolution, the IRGC has become a quasi-governmental institution, with vast independent power and actual oversight and control over key elements of Iran's economy, industry, and energy sectors. It regularly calls for Israel's destruction, and materially supports other terrorist groups around the world with money, training, and equipment.
Bad Boys. There is overwhelming evidence that the IRGC is the largest and most powerful sponsor of global terrorism, writes Navid Mohebbi in Al Arabiya News. (Stock photo)
While Biden has made a new Iran deal a key pillar of his foreign policy even before coming into office, reports to mitigate the looming disaster of delisting the IRGC, suggest Biden is personally resistant to such delisting. These conflicting agendas suggest a combination of schizophrenia, deliberate disinformation and possible incompetence which I discuss in the interview . Delisting the IRGC might help achieve his key foreign policy goal of an Iranian agreement, but looks weak regarding international terrorism, something that he and other Democrats don't need as another foreign policy failure. With the mid-term election in just six months, that's part of the reason that even some moderate Democrats - already resistant to rejoining a nuclear deal that goes too easy on Iran - are urging Biden to stand firm on keeping the IRGC on the terrorist list.
Parting Ways. Disagreeing with the admiration's policy, General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said before the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) that in his personal opinion, he does not support the delisting of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a foreign terrorist organization.
These issues will no doubt be top on the agenda when Biden is expected to visit Israel at the end of June, particularly in light of recent reports that Iran may be days away from enough material for one nuclear bomb. With his coalition shaky at best, Israel's Prime Minister Naftali Bennett cannot afford to appear weak or allow anything to undermine his leadership in protecting Israel from the Iranian threat.
Is this a good cop, bad cop quasi negotiating tactic with Iran, or just a dress rehearsal for another Biden administration foreign policy failure? The implications of delisting these terror groups now, along with FARC, opens old wounds of their victims, brings Jews, Hispanics and all people of conscience closer together, and makes us all less safe.
About the writer:
Jonathan Feldstein - President of the US based non-profit Genesis123 Foundation whose mission is to build bridges between Jews and Christians - is a freelance writer whose articles appear in The Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, Townhall, NorthJersey.com, Algemeiner Jornal, The Jewish Press, major Christian websites and more.
While the mission of Lay of the Land (LotL) is to provide a wide and diverse perspective of affairs in Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world, the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by its various writers are not necessarily ones of the owners and management of LOTL but of the writers themselves. LotL endeavours to the best of its ability to credit the use of all known photographs to the photographer and/or owner of such photographs (0&EO).
No comments:
Post a Comment